Verified background

Biographical facts with sources.

Opportunity and timeline

Where the person is documented to have been, and where the record is silent.

Strongest supporting evidence

The best case proponents can make from the record.

Strongest contradictory evidence

Evidence that tells against the theory.

Disputed and missing

Points in dispute, and records that do not exist or were not found.

Assumptions required

What a reader has to accept for the theory to work.

What would change the assessment

Evidence that, if found, would move the picture.

Assumption records

Bottom line

Editorial assessment (suspects pass)Could-have is not did. Ethnicity, poverty, mental illness, odd behaviour or proximity alone are not evidence of guilt; undocumented whereabouts are neither alibi nor opportunity.

Strong documentary evidence places him in Normandy through September into early October 1888; DNA and letter evidence at most bears on letter-writing, not murder.

Review

Adversarial review (review pass)Adversarial review by this site's editors. Uses only passages already in the dataset plus one newly fetched verbatim passage. 'Strongest case' is the best defensible case from the record, not an endorsement. Contradiction = documents disagree; gap = no document exists.

Strongest case from the record

  • He was fascinated by the case and painted 'Jack the Ripper's Bedroom'. [1]
  • Cornwell's mtDNA and watermark analyses link him to some letters. [1]

Rebuttal

  • Letters place him in Normandy from 6 Sep to early Oct, covering Chapman, Stride and Eddowes. [1][2]
  • The letters with the strongest links are not regarded as genuine. At most they suggest hoaxing. [1][2]
  • The DNA result is consistent with 0.1-10% of the population. [1]
  • He was not suggested as a suspect for over 80 years. [1]

Contradictions (documents disagree)

None recorded.

Gaps (no document exists)

  • Whereabouts 5-31 Aug and in November 1888 (the France evidence does not cover Nichols or Kelly)

Flags

  • understated 'In France at the time of most murders' was rated well_supported from one secondary line. It excludes him only via linkage. Downgraded.
  • interest as evidence Artistic interest in the case is not evidence.

Evidential position: A strong but single-sourced France alibi for three murders. Nothing places him at any scene.